Email Etiquette for Students

Email Etiquette for Students Nowadays, email has become inevitable part of every business or college setting. While back in time you could communicate with your professor face to face only, today you can compose an email and address your concerns or submit assignments (in case your professor allows submitting assignments via email). Naturally, to avoid awkward situations or misunderstandings and other unwanted problems, you have to follow email etiquette. To make it easier for you to email your professors or other college personnel appropriately, this article contains email etiquette tips that all students should follow. When to email your professor or other college personnel You have a problem that has to be addressed as soon as possible, but receiver isn’t in his/her office You have a valid excuse for not going to their office personally e.g. you are sick, not in town etc. You have easy question that can be answered in one paragraph or less You have assignment that can be submitted via email. When to avoid sending email to professor or other college personnel The problem you have is to complex to be dealt with in email Turning in assignments to professors who specifically made it clear they don’t want to receive projects via email Asking for extension for particular assignment (it should be done face to face) Topic of your email requires continuous conversation (do it face to face) *** Professional email address To send email to your professor, you should use your college email address (if you have one) or make sure the address is appropriate and professional in case you use some other emailing system. This will also save you from feeling uncomfortable because you emailed your professor using address like [email  protected]. TIP: if your college (or other email) address contains your initials only, before you get to the point of your email, identify yourself. Also, if you’re a part of large class, to make sure professor knows who sends the email you can include the class name and division. For example, â€Å"this is John Smith from English literature class 8.30 – 9.20, Divison 0008†.

Explaining Supreme Court Decisions - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 6 Words: 1854 Downloads: 1 Date added: 2019/08/19 Category Law Essay Level High school Tags: Supreme Court Essay Did you like this example? As the nations highest court, the Supreme Court makes decisions that affects the lives of everyday people and has major legal implications. The court addresses issues from abortion to free speech. It has the power to strike down laws passed by Congress or actions by the president it interprets to be unconstitutional. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Explaining Supreme Court Decisions" essay for you Create order In theory, the Supreme Court and its members are independent from the rest of the federal government and above politics since they are appointed to the court rather than elected. Several factors influence the decisions that members of the Supreme Court, these factors are precedent, public opinion, interest groups, and the Justices personal political ideologies. I believe that in terms of Madisonian democracy, the Supreme Court is an important and effective institution, despite the paradox it sometimes has in our democracy. When making decisions, the Supreme Court often takes the legal idea of stare decisis into consideration. Stare decisis refers to the Latin phrase let it stand. This refers to precedent. Precedent in a legal system is meant to help guide judges in future decisions they make should the issue or a case related to that issue come up before the court, or lower courts again. When a decision is handed down, Justices can refer to stare decisis as a reason for their decision. When Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) came before the Supreme Court, Sandra Day OConnor in her majority decision reaffirmed the constitutional right to an abortion set in Roe v. Wade (1973). Roe set the precedent that the right to an abortion was guaranteed by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Despite the Courts ruling reaffirming the right to an abortion, this precedent has been put aside before. The Supreme Court upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Act of 2003 in the case of Gonzales v. Carhart (2007). In that case, then Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion that that banning partial-birth abortion was not an undue burden on women who were seeking an abortion, and that Congress indeed had the power to ban partial-birth abortions. In her dissent, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg claimed that the Court was ignoring precedent by placing a restriction on abortion, and not allowing a woman to make a decision for herself. In other cases, precedent in the Supreme Court has been outright ignored. The Supreme Court overturned previously established precedent made in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) in its decision of Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which regarded the idea of separate but equal expressed in Plessy as unconstitutional. Precedent was once again ignored in the case of Lawrence v. Texas (2003), which overturned the case of Bowers v. Hardwick (1986), which had upheld the constitutionality of anti-sodomy laws in the United States. The Supreme Court has taken the idea of precedent into its legal decisions, and at times, chosen to accept it or ignore it, as seen in these cases mentioned above. When the Supreme Court makes decisions, public opinion is taken into consideration. One may wonder why the Court would bother to do this, as the members of the Court are appointed for life, and the Justices do not have to answer to the American people why they rule in a particular way, unlike decisions made by Congress or the President of the United States. The Court takes public opinion into consideration because the decision would likely reflect the values of the American people. The Warren court is a prime example of this, as it made liberal decisions at a time when the American people were rather liberal in regards to matters such as race, as seen in Loving v. Virginia (1967), or free speech in Tinker v. Des Moines (1969). These examples require looking at the context of the time period these decisions were made in. Loving struck down bans on interracial marriage at a time when the Civil Rights movement was well underway by then. Tinker was handed down at a time when protesting t he Vietnam War was almost universal among the American people, who had grown frustrated with the deteriorating situation in Southeast Asia. Further examples could even include the infamous decision of Korematsu v. United States (1944), as a reflection of the mindset of the American public and anti-Japanese sentiment during World War II. Bringing us to the 21st century, the Supreme Court has made decisions that reflected public opinion, in overturning anti-sodomy laws in Lawrence v. Texas (2003), or striking down the Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 in United States v. Windsor (2013) and guaranteeing same sex couples the right to marry in Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), decisions that would have been seen as impossible to hand down in previous eras of American history and times when support for same sex marriage was not as high as they have been since the 2000s. These are examples of how public opinion can sway decisions made by the Supreme Court. Interest groups are known to try to persuade the Court in its decision-making. Whenever a case that concerns their particular interest comes before the Court, interest groups will already be there the moment the Court announces they will take up that case. One of the first steps interest groups take is filing an amicus curiae briefs, In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), a case which considered whether or gun restrictions by the District of Columbia violate the Second Amendment, the National Rifle Association filed an amicus brief, as did the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, interest groups with different priorities when it comes to guns. When a controversial issue such as abortion or voting rights come before the Court, interest groups like NARAL or National Right to Life, and the NAACP or ACLU all file amicus briefs. Apart from this, they attempt to mobilize their members in an effort to gather in demonstrations and put pressure on the court to rule in their favor. In recent years, interest groups have become more involved in the nomination process for federal judges. Interest groups have worked either to support or deny the confirmation of a judge nominated to the Supreme Court. This is seen in the case of the NAACP, ACLU both vigorously opposing the nomination of Robert Bork to the Supreme Court in 1987. In other cases, interest groups have played some sort of role in the selection of a particular judge. These interest groups want a judge whose ideology is closer to theirs. This is evident in the nominations of Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court under the Trump administration. Gorsuch and Kavanaugh were pre selected from a list created by the Federalist Society, a Conservative legal group. This was the result of carefully collaborated attempts by the Republican party to pack the judicial system with Conservative leaning judges, an ongoing effort going back to the Nixon administration. All of this is how interest groups have tried to influence the decisions made by the Supreme Court. The final factor behind the decision making of the Supreme Court is none other than the Justices themselves. Their ideologies are one of the most common reasons behind the reasoning of a Justices decision in a case before the Court. Their ideology is one of the reasons why they are chosen when nominated to the Supreme Court by whoever the president is. For instance, Franklin Delano Roosevelt nominated liberals William O. Douglas and Hugo Black in order to support the New Deal, and Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, the late George H.W. Bush, and George W. Bush nominated conservatives such as the late William Rehnquist and Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito, all of whom have been known for their judicial philosophy known as Originalism. Since Richard Nixon nominated Warren Burger to the position of Chief Justice in 1969, and up through the Rehnquist and Roberts courts, the Supreme Court has leaned strongly Conservative, this position considered to have been solidified with t he nomination and confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh in October of 2018. The Justices themselves are believed to try to stay on the Supreme Court as long as they can until a president of their particular political party can nominate a like minded successor. For instance, John Paul Stevens and Harry Blackmun, two of the most liberal justices to serve on the Court, chose to wait to retire under the Obama administration, despite already being 90 years old at the time. and Chief Justice Warren Burger retired in 1986 while President Reagan was in office and Republicans controlled the Senate, allowing a like minded successor to be confirmed on the Supreme Court. Thurgood Marshall, a liberal justice, was less than successful in securing a similar ideological successful as he had to retire due to poor health under the George H.W. Bush administration, being replaced by Clarence Thomas, known as one of the most conservative, and quiet justices on the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court plays a check and balance on both the executive and legislative branches, but is it democratic? The Supreme Court is considered to be the least democratic of the three branches. The fact that Justices are appointed, rather than elected is a clear factor that it can sound undemocratic, though this claim with refuted that the president who nominates this justice and the Senate which provides its advice and consent are both chosen by the American people. In our Madisonian democracy, much like the electoral college, the Supreme Court is meant to protect the minority from the tyranny of the majority. Even Justice John Marshall II advocated that the judiciary should not make policy from the bench, and leave that up to the President and Congress. The Supreme Court gave itself the power of judicial review in Marbury v. Madison (1803) in order to give itself independence from both the President and Congress, a move that would be considered undemocratic. An example of judicia l review was in the case of United States v. Nixon (1974), where the Supreme Court, including Justices who were nominated by President Nixon himself ruled against him in his claims that executive privilege allowed him to be above the law and turn over evidence in a criminal investigation. This landmark decision limited the Presidents powers, and the Court found that the Supreme Court had the final say in questions regarding to the Constitution, reaffirming its unique and important role in our democracy. The Founding Fathers themselves were clearly not worried about a powerful judiciary, noting that it can make decisions and strike down laws and acts by the president or Congress, but it cannot enforce those decisions, as seen with ending racial segregation in the South after Brown v. Board of Education (1954) was decided. An independent judiciary has been a hallmark of American democracy. The Court makes decisions that affects Americans of all walks of life. But in order for these decisions to happen, there are several ways which try to influence how these decisions are made. They are public opinion, interest groups, precedent, and the personal political ideologies of the Justices. Despite how undemocratic it might sound at times, the Court plays a crucial role in our Madisonian democracy, and must continue to do so in order to remain an effective body of the federal government.

The Handmaids Tale as a Biblical Allusion Essay - 1462 Words

The Handmaids Tale: A Biblical Allusion Imagine a country where choice is not a choice. One is labeled by their age and economical status. The deep red cloaks, the blue embroidered dresses, and the pinstriped attire are all uniforms to define a persons standing in society. To be judged, not by beauty or personality or talents, but by the ability to procreate instead. To not believe in the Puritan religion is certain death. To read or write is to die. This definition is found to be true in the book, The Handmaids Tale (1986) by Margaret Atwood. It is a heartbreaking story of one young woman and her transformation into the Gilead society, the society described above. In the book, we meet Offred, the narrator of the story. This†¦show more content†¦This allusion is applied with this one quote from Aunt Lydia, the woman who indoctrinated the handmaids to the ways of the Republic of Gilead, The Republic of Gilead. . . knows no bounds. Gilead is within you (p. 23, italics: mine). The lush soil, and the future, of Gilead was located within the handmaids. Another allusion is that of Offreds name. Each handmaid is required to take up the name of the Commander to which they are assigned. For example, Offred belongs to the Commander named Fred, therefore, her name is Of. . . fred. But there is a deeper meaning to her seemingly menial name. Offreds name could also be interpreted as Off. . . red. To understand this biblical allusion, one must first understand the required uniform of the handmaids. Offred describes, I. . . advance my feet into the sunlight, in their red shoes, flat heeled to save the spine and not for dancing. The red gloves are lying on the bed. I pick them up, pull them onto my hands, finger by finger. Everything except the wings around my face is red: the color of blood, which defines us. The skirt is ankle- length, full, gathered to a flat yoke. . . , the sleeves are full. The white wings too are prescribed issue; they are to keep us from seeing, but also from being seen (p. 8). Each maiden is cloaked in crimso n, the color of blood. Isaiah 1:18 reads, Though your sins are likeShow MoreRelatedThe Handmaid s Tale By Margaret Atwood1684 Words   |  7 Pagesenforces laws and regulations in order to maintain peace and harmony in society. Laws are meant to ensure the safety of all citizens however; women can be forced to face extremities if the laws and the government are patriarchal. The novel The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood tells the story of a totalitarian government that consists strictly of men who dominate women based on Christian ideologies. The government uses fertile women called â€Å"handmaids† for breeding purposes because of a decrease inRead MoreEssay about Dystopia Society in the Handmaid ´s Tale by Margaret Atwood1000 Words   |  4 PagesIn Atwood’s novel The Handmaid’s Tale, Margaret Atwood writes about a dystopia society. Atwood used situations that were happening during the time she began writing her novel, for example, women’s rights, politics, and in religious aspects. Atwood’s novel is relevant to contemporary society. There are similarities between Atwood’s novel and our society today, which lends to the possibility that our modern society might be headed to a less intense version of this dystopia society. In the novel AtwoodRead MoreThe Handmaid s Tale Literacy Essay1841 Words   |  8 PagesENG4U: The Handmaid’s Tale Literacy Essay Shoshannah Lewis Margret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale takes place in the closely monitored, male dominant area of Gilead where women are deprived of their sexual and human rights, forbidding them to live independently. For many years prior to Gilead’s existence, women were seen as inferior to men and neglected of basic human rights such as voting, career opportunities, and equal salaries. The Republic of Gilead was later introduced following the transitionRead MoreA Modest Proposal And The Handmaids Tale1592 Words   |  7 Pagessatires to expose flaws, an effective example is John Smith’s A Modest Proposal, he effectively uses irony, to communicate his argument about the poverty in Ireland at the time. Similarly, Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale criticizes the society that women have to live in. Atwood uses allusions to the Old Testament and historical events to satirize the oppression of women in political, religious and social aspects. Atwood parallels the Cultural Revolution in China to the how the Gilead governmentRead More Atwoods Attention to Words in The Handmaids Tale Essay1180 Words   |  5 PagesAtwoods Attention to Words in The Handmaids Tale The Handmaids Tale illustrates that dictatorship can be established by creating a state of fear once language controls are instituted. As a tradition to dystopian novels, Atwood has drawn much attention to the meaning of words and the significance of names, as well as the prohibition for women to read or write, in order to portray Gilead as a successful totalitarian state. Atwood is trying to make the point that in a dystopian world, languageRead MoreThe Handmaid s Tale By Margaret Atwood982 Words   |  4 PagesLanguage, arguably mankind’s most influential invention, not only forms the foundation for human culture, but is also embedded within every aspect of our cyclical lives. In The Handmaid’s Tale, Margaret Atwood skillfully portrays the systematic oppression in the Republic of Gilead, as seen through the array of forms that language encompasses. Ultimately, Atwood depicts language as a manipulative tool used by the totalitarian regime to undermine its perceivably dystopian nature by spreading a falseRead MoreThe Handmaid s Tale By Margaret Atwood1249 Words   |  5 PagesDystopian Research Essay: The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood In the words of Erika Gottlieb With control of the past comes domination of the future. A dystopia reflects and discusses major tendencies in contemporary society. The Handmaid s Tale is a dystopian novel written by Margaret Atwood in 1985. The novel follows its protagonist Offred as she lives in a society focused on physical and spiritual oppression of the female identity. Within The Handmaid s Tale it is evident that through theRead MoreComparison between The handmaids Tale and 1894 (language as controlling force, language styles, structure and contexts3493 Words   |  14 Pages Both the novels 1984 and The Handmaids Tale provide warnings of how each author sees certain problems in society leading to dystopian states. Dystopian genres exist in both novels, but arise for different reasons. Resulting from Atwoods concerns about political groups and aspects of feminism; The Handmaids Tale illustrates how declining birth rates could lead to a state where women are forced into bearing children. In contrast, 1984 depicts a terror state where poverty is rife and tyrannicalRead MoreHow Does Margaret Atwood Establish and Develop a Dystopian Narrative in Her Novel ‚Äà ²the Handmaid‚Äà ´s Tale‚Äà ´?2152 Words   |  9 PagesThroughout Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale an imagined place or state in which everything is unpleasant or bad, typically a totalitarian or environmentally degraded state is created through the use of multiple themes and narrative techniques. In a dystopia, we can usually find a society that has become all kinds of wrong, in direct contrast to a utopia, or a perfect society. Like many totalitarian states, the Republic of Gilead starts out as an envisioned utopia by a select few: a remade worldRead MoreLiterary Response : The Handmaid s Tale1361 Words   |  6 PagesSummer/ Literary Response †¢ The Handmaid’s Tale †¢ Margaret Atwood †¢ 324 pages †¢ Published 1986 1. Point of View: The novel is written in first person point of view. In first person point of view, we are brought into the mind and world of the main character, Offred. This allows the reader to experience moments and memories as vividly as she does. Ultimately, the reader bonds and sympathizes with Offred. 2. Main Characters: a. Offred , 33 years old b. Offred is rebellious, nostalgic, and remorseful

Saint John Of The Cross (1866 words) Essay Example For Students

Saint John Of The Cross (1866 words) Essay Saint John Of The CrossSaint John of the Cross I abandoned and forgot myself, laying my face onmy Beloved; all things ceased; I went out from myself, leaving my caresforgotten among the lilies. John of the Cross is one of the acknowledgedmasters of mystical theology. It is thought among present day theologians thatthere is no other writer who has had a greater influence on Catholicspirituality than John of the Cross. He is a canonized saint of the CatholicChurch and was made a Doctor of the Church because of his extreme influence onpresent day doctrine. His dedication as a leader in service is surpassed only byhis deep faith in the workings of the Trinity through Jesus on earth as a modeland the Holy Spirit as our guide to a life of spirituality. John of the Crosswas born Juan de Yepes in 1542 to a poor family of Spanish nobility. When Johnwas a boy, he attended a school for poor children, gaining a basic education,and the opportunity to learn skills from local craftsmen. When he wa s 17, Johnbegan to work at the Plague Hospital de la Concepcion, and its founder offeredto let him attend the Jesuit College, so long as he did not neglect his hospitalduties. From 1559 to 1563, John studied with the Jesuits, learning Latin, Greek,and other subjects. He was offered the chance to study for the secularpriesthood, which would have given him material security, but he felt God wascalling him to Religious life. At age 20, he entered the Carmelite Order, beingclothed with the habit on February 24, 1563, and taking the name Juan de SantoMatia (John of Saint Matthias). He was ordained in 1567, and said his first Massin Medina del Campo. During that trip, he first met Teresa of Avila, and sheencouraged him to promote her reform among the mens Order. John spent much ofhis time working for the reformation of the Carmelite Order and in the overallservice of others. However, there were said problems with his ideas of reformfrom certain members of his Order. On the night of Decemb er 2, 1577, a group ofCarmelites, lay people, and men-at-arms broke into Johns quarters, seizedhim, and took him away. The men led John away, handcuffed, and blindfolded, to amonastery in Toledo. John stood accused of being rebellious and as an overallthreat to the Order. John would have to submit to the demands of the Order, orundergo severe punishment. Nonetheless, John refused to renounce the reform inwhich he so truly had faith. John was locked up in the monastery prison becauseof his strong convictions toward reform. He was placed in a windowless dark roomof six by ten feet, with little light, and with little air. This hole of a cellwas exposed to the terribly cold winter months and the suffocating heat of thesummer months. This, aside for the beatings, the filth, the forced fasting, andthe lice, made it an unfavorable situation for anyone. However, John did not seethe situation as the rest of humanity would see it. John found the situation tobe a blessing because he was able t o remove all of his earthly needs anddesires, and find the true place where God was hidden. God brought John hisgreatest joys in those times of pain and suffering. In a sense, the oppressorswhom imprisoned John, gave him what he truly wanted. God. In time, John was ableto escape the prison cell in which he was held by physically unscrewing thebolts on his door. Thought to be achieved miraculously by some, John was able tocreep past the guards, climb down the wall, and regain his freedom. From thetime of his escape until the time of his death, John devoted his life to thesharing and explaining of his experience of the Lords grace and love. Saint John of the Cross, in the darkness of your worst moments, when youwere alone and persecuted, you found God. Help me to have faith that God isthere especially in the times when God seems absent and far away. Amen.After his time in the monastery prison and his eventual escape, John was able toagain take up his mission of reform far away from the conflicts and threats thatimpeded him prior. He never cared to go over the past and talk about hisimprisonment. He bore no animosity toward his oppressors; nor did he complain orboast about the suffering that he had endured. Because of his experience, Johnwas now more than ever before, able to appreciate the natural world around him. John was now able to listen to all of nature through his senses; the flowers,the whistling breezes, the night, the dawn; all were manifestations of the Lord. This seemed to be one of Johns only vices, if it could fairly be called that. John could not easily resist the enchantment of nature. John was ver much human. The rushing streams, the flowers in the field, the vast mountains, and all ofnature spoke to him. God was present everywhere. Come and see these littlecreatures of God. How well they worship the Almighty! John found itimpossible to ignore any person of the world who was in personal distress. However, John did not limit himself to only assisting others who were seekingspiritual enlightenment, but he looked for ways to help those with materialneeds as well. John was a selfless man who lived for the service of others. There were countless examples and stories of how John would go to great lengthsto help out his fellow man in the least. Further, this lifestyle of service didnot end at the material needs of others, but transmitted in the physical needsof the sick. Taking pains to show the most delicate sympathy for the sick, heknew how to care for them, comfort them, and give them hope. He would not allowthe question of money to interfere with his desire to give his sick friars thebest possible care. He was a true leader in service. It was out of thispoverty and suffering, that John learned to search for beauty and happiness notin the world, but in God. But Johns deepest concern was for thosepersons who were suffering in their spiritual life. In his oral teachings, Johnused to point out that the more you love God, the more you grow spiritually. Further, the growth that he desired was to include all people and help themachieve that spiritual understanding. In his spiritual direction of others, Johnfocused on the communion with God in faith, hope, and love. Ultimately, the wayto truly receive that spiritual life was to follow those teachings of faith,hope, and love as Christ did. Pain for John was not a misfortune but a valuewhen suffered with and for Christ. John recognized that we could not understandthe truth of Christ without the Holy Spirit, the basis of our personalspirituality. He wanted everyone to find comfort in the thought that howeversevere it may be, purification is still the work of Gods gentle hand, clearingaway the debris of attachment and making room for the divine light. Hardphysical labor in the service of others attracted him because he knew howimportant it was for him to achieve that true spiritual awareness. John did whatneeded to be done. What more do you want, o soul! And what else do yousearch for out side, when within yourself you possess your riches, delights,satisfaction and Kingdom your Beloved whom you desire and seek? Desire Himthere, adore Him there; Do not go in pursuit of Him outside yourself. You willonly become distracted and you wont find Him, or enjoy Him more than by seekingHim within you. One of the main sources that gave John of the Cross hisgreat inspiration was the Bible. The Bible, which he cherished most of allworldly objects, helped him understand the mystery of the three Persons of theTrinity. This further understanding of the Trinity allowed John to help himselfand encourage others to achieve such a level of enlightenment. As stated prior,John spent his entire life in the service of others and sought to spread thatcherished understanding in which he received through his personal pains andsuffering. This spiritual journey was and is for every person. For John, theBible served as a living and unfailing wellspring. Its waters pervade the entirebeing of this m ystical thinker, poet, and writer. The Bible was his hymnal, hismeditation book, a book for travel, for contemplation, and for writing. The use of modalizers in a film review: The Passio EssayScriptural quotations throughout his works show how deeply he had assimilatedthe Divine Word, but he never keeps to a single exegetical style; and the readermight find this disconcerting. For John, he was able to visualize ways in whichthe biblical texts could assist him in his ministry of spiritual direction. TheBible offered John a viable expression of his own personal spiritual experience. The Bible was a confirmation of his theological reform and ministry. Further,John was able to enjoy and follow the practice of using scriptural passages as aguide through the journey of life. John discovered a close alliance betweenbiblical history and his own personal history, and was able to use thatconnection of past experiences with his own personal experiences. John of theCross was a very influential individual in the Catholic Church who furtherextended the lifestyle of service in which Christ instilled. Although mostpeople would gather that John might have been angered or disillusioned by hisimprisonment, persecution, and suffering throughout his life, rather Johnsreaction was quite the opposite. These painful events in his life transformedhim into a man of charity who held a deep compassion for those who suffered. John saw a clear vision of the beauty of Gods creation and its intimacy withthe Blessed Trinity. Through suffering like Christ suffered, John was able toachieve that spiritual enlightenment. John fell ill at the end of his life in avery small village on a service trip to Mexico. John died as he had prayed forthroughout his ministry of service: without honors, without material comfort,and with great suffering. These pains and great suffering were voluntarily takenup to exemplify the suffering of Christ. His persecutions throughout his lifewere voluntarily taken up taken up to exemplify the suffering of Christ. Thiswas his faith, and this was how he lived and died. Whoever wishes to comeafter me must deny himself, take up his cross, and follow me. John of theCross was 49 when he died. He was beatified in 1675, canonized as a saint in1726, and declared a Doctor of the Church in 1926. His life was a never-endingpursuit of that ministry of service and compassion that Christ instilled prio r. John of the Cross was and still is a man to be patterned after because of hisspiritually enlightened understanding of the life and actions of Christ. He wastruly a Man for Others. BibliographyPayne, Steven. John of the Cross and the Cognitive Value of Mysticism. KluwerAcademic Publishers. Volume 37, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 1990. Swietlicki,Catherine. Spanish Christian Cabala. University of Missouri Press. Columbia,Missouri, The United States 1986. Three Mystics. Father Bruno de J.M., ed. Sheedand Ward Ltd. London, England 1952. Wilhelmsen, Elizabeth. Knowledge andSymbolization in Saint John of the Cross. Verlag Peter Lang GmbH. Volume 41,Frankfurt, Germany 1993. Wojotyla, Karol. Faith According to Saint John of theCross. Saint Ignatius Press. San Francisco, California, The United States 1981. The Bible